Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to President Donald Trump’s executive overreach. Oral ...

The three Trump-appointed Supreme Court justices shared apparent interest in legal rationales that could deliver the ...

The Supreme Court will decide whether President Trump’s sweeping global tariffs are legal in a case with major consequences ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday over whether a federal emergency powers law authorizes President Trump's most ...

President Trump’s tariffs were met with reservations from the Supreme Court as his administration faced incisive questioning ...

The Trump administration argued that the president had the authority to issue sweeping tariffs under a law reserved for use ...

WASHINGTON, Nov 5 (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices raised doubts on Wednesday over the legality of President Donald ...

After the U.S. Supreme Court used a conservative legal principle called the "major questions" doctrine to blow holes in ...

The Republican leaders of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees told Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. that anonymous ...

Should the court manage to overturn the tariffs without refunding the revenue, Trump should take a public loss as a private win and return to focusing on economic growth.

Most judges who have considered President Donald Trump’s disputed tariffs have ruled against him. But when the Supreme Court hears his appeal next week, it may be influenced by a forceful dissenting ...

The takeaway is that the tariffs may actually fall because of the conservative justices’ sincere commitment to their own ...