A case focusing on anti-discrimination protections for transgender high school students has raised new controversy: a debate over whether or not attorneys used AI to draft a brief regarding the case.

The bench, also comprising justices R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi, was hearing a contempt petition filed by Vidyadas Babaji, a seer and archaka of the Anjaneya temple located at Anjanadri Hills| Ind ...

The Supreme Court is taking up a case on whether Paramount violated the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) by ...

The high court's decision is a win for insurers, with it saying that standard commercial liability policies cannot cover lawsuits alleging injury from environmental pollution, and said it was ...

American economist and public policy analyst Jeffrey Sachs, a professor at Columbia University, speaks to Anant Goenka, ...

A decision at the center of geopolitical tensions and the president's pledge to 'take back' canal shipping facilities from ...

It is far rarer and more difficult for state authorities to try to investigate federal law enforcement officials than the ...

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a case which asks whether the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) applies to users who sign up for newsletters from websites that use Meta's tracking ...

After a court ruling held that mandatory life-without-parole sentences are unconstitutional for juveniles, Neilly was ...

One confounding factor in how someone views a video is something psychologists have dubbed “slow-motion bias.” In one 2016 ...

Immigration Matters is a recurring series by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández that analyzes the court’s immigration docket, ...

The Supreme Court reversed a lower court’s decision to give a man a new trial for the attempted murder of his girlfriend.